Roots of Revitalization

Social Change Through Action In Pottstown PA

Community Cohesion January 10, 2012

Filed under: Quality of Life Issues — roots of revitalization @ 9:44 am
Tags: , ,

By Anya Rhoads -Lafferty

  • We live in America—the land of freedom—the land of opportunity—the land of choices. Many different facets make America the great country it is; however, along with these freedoms and opportunities and choices sometimes comes hardship, tragedy, and poor decision-making, not just on the part of individuals, but also families, businesses, corporations, and government.The current economic strife America is facing is affecting everyone from individuals, families, local businesses, large corporations and, most importantly, our government. Across the board we all have had to make changes and sacrifices in order to survive on a day-to-day basis. No one likes change (good or bad), as we are creatures of habit, but sometimes we are forced to make changes because of outside influences (such as the current economic state of our country).

    Sometimes individuals, corporations, and government make poor choices that only serve to continually affect us negatively. Maybe it is because we just made the wrong choice, or maybe we chose to make the wrong choice. Whatever the situation is, we still have to continue to find a way to survive and stay strong.

    With a town like Pottstown, which continues to struggle financially and cosmetically, drastic change needs to occur. In Pottstown (the 19464 zip code), we have the borough of Pottstown and we have all of the Pottsgrove communities which surround it. On the outskirts of these two towns we have cities to our North—Gilbertsville, Bechtelsville, and Boyertown. These latter three towns most recently merged their fire departments together. Merging of businesses and companies can save one from being shut down completely, can save money, and brings people together. In the aftermath of 9/11, America came together in the wake of tragedy. In the wake of our current economic strife, we need to come together as a community. Pottstown and Pottsgrove need to follow in the footsteps of the fire departments in Gilbertsville, Bechtelsville, and Boyertown and merge to make ONE town.

    I can understand that the citizens residing in the Pottsgrove communities do not want to take on the financial burdens of the Pottstown borough. All towns and cities have their issues—no town or city is immune. As a whole, Pottsgrove appears to have their affairs in order and take care of their communities. Maybe our borough councilmen do not have the proper means to save the borough and maybe they do. If Pottsgrove and Pottstown were to come together and become ONE community—it would save our schools, save jobs, save the town, save money, and bring Pottstown (as a whole) back to life. With the Department of Education cutting funds for students, it only makes sense to merge these two school districts together. Why do we need two school districts in the same zip code anyway? If you look at our neighboring districts—Owen J. Roberts, Boyertown, Springford, Phoenixville, etc.—you see they do not have more than one school district within their towns. The best example is the Gilbertsville, Becthelsville, Boyertown cities (all of which have different zip codes) but they have ONE school district. Those towns are as close together as Pottstown and Pottsgrove. It makes no sense to have two school districts. If the Department of Education continues to reduce funding, they will either force school districts within a specified radius to merge, or we as a community will be forced to merge.

    I think of the powers that be in Pottstown were to enforce laws (i.e. hold slumlords accountable, enforce codes and laws, terminate water service to those who do not pay their bills, and escalate recuperating tax funds that are overdue in a more timely fashion to the extent of the law) that maybe Pottsgrove would be more agreeable to a merger.

    It is very difficult to take steps to make differences when people put up a barrier and don’t think of others. It is time for us as Americans to work together and be there for each other and stop asking “what’s in it for me?” Change is difficult…coming in to help clean up a mess is difficult…these times are difficult, but if we work together as a people, a community, and a country, think of the wonderful changes we can make! Pottstown and Pottsgrove should set the standard and make changes before they are forced upon us. By working together, we could make other communities stand up and say “hey—look how great that town is—how they worked together…we want to be like them!” Think about it…let’s come together and make positive change and make others turn their heads to us in jealousy and see the good we have done and they will follow suit. This can help change the world one town at a time and bring us together. Our children need to learn this valuable lesson and work together as a community. We need to get our kids out of the house, off the couch, out from in front of the television and video games. Third world countries work together each and every day (physical labor) to have the very few means they have, including food. If we get up and get moving, we also would be changing the obesity issue in our country. Let’s make big change together!

    Everyone takes the time to forward e-mails and text messages…let’s take it a step further. Let’s make big change that reverberates across the states. How far can we get our message sent and create change? Are you up for the challenge?


    Anya Rhoads-Lafferty

    Anya Rhoads-Lafferty

    Anya is a life time resident of Pottstown, PA and teacher at Antonelli Medical & Professional Institute . She studied Medical Secretary/Secretarial Sciences at Pennsylvania Business Institute, and is a member of  Phi Theta Kappa through MCCC.

     

 

Protester’s Perspective September 1, 2011

                                             The Sociological Perspective

By Teri Jensen-Sellers

Lately, I have been referred to as both radical, brazen, and OUT OF LINE! I  would like to explain why I feel so strongly about local blight and the social ramifications of slumlord property negligence! What is so “radical” about asking a SLUMLORD to maintain his rental property and to pay taxes? When SLUMLORDS avoid both of these acts of decency, they are being criminalistic.  Breaking code violations and tax evasion are illegal, and  this makes SLUMLORDS public enemy’s. So said slumlords are rumored to be telling borough officials and the Historic Area Review Board  that we were blocking traffic on the street while we protested their contributions to local blight on August 26th. I can assure you were we on the sidewalk, and letting traffic through normally, as several police officers who passed us can verify!

I am not sure why people are afraid to stand up for the right thing? Business owners know that nearby blighted properties influence their professional image, and caring residents don’t want the crime or trash associated with these properties. I was hoping for more people to demonstrate these SOCIAL NORMS AND VALUES, as I expected more neighborly solidarity. The slumlord situation here in the borough can be defined as  “Orwellian” a scenario, thought, or societal condition that is identified as being detrimental to the welfare of society. The public apathy to the situation can be defined as “Torporous” as in a state of lethargy and indifference.

“The Broken Window Theory” originated in an 1982 Atlantic Monthly article by sociologists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling. The basic outline for this theory reads: “A major factor in determining individual behavior is social norms, internalized rules about the appropriate way to act in a certain situation. Humans constantly monitor other people and their environment in order to determine what the correct norms for the given situation are. A disordered environment which is littered, vandalized and not maintained sends the signal:  this is a place where people do as they please and where they get away with that, without being detected.  As people tend to act the way they think others act, they are more likely to act “disorderly” in the disordered environment.”

Unmanaged rental properties encourage urban blight which evolves into the broken window social phenomena.  Sociologist, Rachel Ranis of Quinnipiac University states that the Broken Window Theory begins “when the little things are neglected – broken windows, graffiti, petty crime – it snowballs into full-blown urban decay quite quickly, and it’s hard to bounce back from that.”

What does this do to family units within the urban environment?  Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay who were part of the Chicago School of Thought in Sociology, and the think-tank behind“The Cultural Transmission Theory”,  foresaw several negative consequences when culture or localities become scourged.  The Cultural transmission Theory predicts that in unmanaged areas such as run down neighborhoods, delinquency becomes accepted, and generational. Worse crime becomes acceptable and so do unsupervised children.  Professor Jennifer Huck of Indiana University of Pennsylvania claims that” “Reduced levels of child supervision will result in poor school achievement, with a consequent reduction in stakes in conformity and an increase in deviant behavior. Poor, dense neighborhoods tend to be mixed-use neighborhoods. Mixed use increases familiarity with and easy access to places offering the opportunity for deviance. Unrepaired buildings leads to greater concerns for personal safety among area residents.These concerns lead to further decreases in maintenance and repair; to increased delinquency, vandalism, and crime; and to even further deterioration in safety and the physical environment—all resulting in offenders from other neighborhoods being increasingly attracted by the area’s perceived vulnerability.”

WOULD YOU WANT YOUR CHILDREN LIVING NEAR UNSAFE BUILDING STRUCTURES AND LOCALLY TOLERATED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?

As the parents of two young sons, my husband and I will do ANYTHING to protect our boys from this kind of social destruction, and that is why we are protesting! SLUMLORDS WILL NOT TAKE AWAY MY FAMILY’S RIGHT TO LIVE IN A SAFE, CLEAN AND DECENT TOWN!

                                              

                                   The Homeowner Perspective

By Katie Jackson

By this time, each summer, I’d usually find myself feeling thread bare, weary and plum exhausted by the chaos and noise of a neighborhood that could be the Poster Child for the Broken Windows Theory.  The relative calm of this early September is almost palpable, a welcome relief for homeowners, conscientious landlords, good tenants and visitors in our downtown neighborhood.  

Law enforcement has stepped up their foot and bike patrols, police supervisors are frequently seen on our streets.  We have a dedicated, hard-working Borough Manager in Jason Bobst, Codes Enforcement is re-tooling for swift action while the new Guardian Angels are a welcome site.  Well rested, re-energize residents are stepping up to the plate to take back their neighborhood, working with each other and with the borough.

Our load lightened, this reprieve has given many of us the opportunity to re-group and connect with one another. We’re not expending all of our energies being watchful of our streets, calling the Police, calling Codes, picking up the trash in our yards, on our sidewalks, streets and alleys.  The Mercury experiment to refrain from reporting on the antics of elected officials, for the month of August, has also contributed to a kinder, gentler sensibility. I feel a renewed spirit among people in my neighborhood and Pottstown in general.

I find myself spending more time in front of my home now, visiting with neighbors, imagining my block in it’s glory days and envisioning the potential.  The predominant, neglected rental properties that scar this once grand old working class neighborhood beckon me to tell their story.  

At one time the homes here were proudly cared for by the people who owned them. They provided the warmth, comfort and nurturing that the word “home” conjures up for me. They were the keepers of the laughter and joy of holidays, new babies, birthday parties…all of  life’s celebrations, as well as the losses and sorrows of those who came before us.   Safe from the elements, solace awaited at the end of a busy day, as residents found peace and comfort within the confines of their homes and their neighborhoods.  The homes near downtown were also the foundation of a community of friends, family, business and industry that once thrived here and completed the circle of “community”.  

Ragged, worn, and often aluminum clad you can still gleen glimpses of the beauty of the rich architecture and craftsmanship that adorn many of the structures that remain. I can see, in my mind’s eye, how some of these homes, (but not all of them to be sure), of could be brought back to respectable service and grace returned to their rightful stature.  Today, these homes tell a story of the more recent indignities they have endured and their tenacious will to hold on in hope of better days to come.  Some will make it and sadly, some will not.

The heart and soul of “my” neighborhood has been broken, but not destroyed, by a system that richly rewards greed.  It is a system whose only sustaining beneficiaries are the negligent absentee property owners who turn a blind eye to the degradation of their rental properties, who blatantly defy the borough, the law, the people they rent to and the taxpaying residents of Pottstown.  We pay, we pay and we pay again for their heartless misdeeds in our neighborhood.

This summer has given me a glimmer of hope, of courage and commitment to our borough. As the old homes continue to tell their recent histories of indifference, neglect and abuse, they are being heard.  The message is resonating with residents and borough officials alike as we begin to work together to reclaim our identity, our homes, our neighborhoods and redefine our values, our sense of belonging and our purpose.

We’re rolling up the welcome mat,  we’re saying “no thanks” to those who are motivated only by the size of their bank accounts and we have the State of Pennsylvania on our team.  The onus is on the slumlords now.

  

                                         

The First Anti-Slumlord Protest. August 2011. courtesy of The Mercury.